MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317408799 · doi:10.1021/ie5032056

Production of Isooctane from Isobutene: Energy Integration and Carbon Dioxide Abatement via Catalytic Distillation

2015· article· en· W2317408799 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProcess Optimization and Integration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Ontario
KeywordsGasolineChemistryNaphthaOctane ratingDistillationChemical engineeringCatalysisOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Isooctane is a valuable octane enhancer for gasoline and the primary component of aviation gasoline, also known as Avgas, because of its high antiknock quality. Conventional industrial processes for isooctane production involve the steps of dimerization of isobutene, dimer separation, and hydrogenation. The efficacy of catalytic distillation (CD) and its merits, in terms of energy savings and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, for the production of isooctane are quantitatively presented. The feed considered for the isooctane production is composed of isobutene (C 4 ) and inerts (isopentane) produced in refineries as byproducts of steam cracking of naphtha and light gas oil. Process flow sheets for the two routes for the production of isooctane, with and without CD, are modeled. The conventional industrial flow sheet composed of a dimerization reactor, distillation column, and a hydrogenation reactor (configuration A), is simulated using Aspen Plus. The intensified process flow sheet comprising a CD column for the dimerization, hydrogenation, and separation (configuration B) is modeled using gPROMS. A validated, nonequilibrium, three-phase model is developed in a gPROMS environment and is used to quantify the energy savings and reduction of carbon dioxide emissions achieved using a CD column for the intensified process. Results demonstrate CD to be a promising candidate to replicate the conversions and product purity obtained in the conventional process while resulting in significant energy savings, more efficient utilization of isobutene feed, and reduced carbon dioxide emissions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.214
Threshold uncertainty score0.633

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it