MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317448825 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2013-0030

Analytical solution for laser short-pulse heating of two-dimensional solids: volumetric and surface heat source considerations

2013· article· en· W2317448825 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bekir Sami Yilbaş, Ahmad Y. Al‐Dweik

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Material Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKing Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
KeywordsLaserPhysicsSimilarity solutionThermalIntensity (physics)Volumetric heat capacityHeat equationThermodynamicsPulse (music)Surface (topology)MechanicsHeat transferOpticsHeat flux

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An analytical solution for lattice temperature distribution in a metallic solid subjected to laser short-pulse heating is presented. The method of similarity solution is adopted for the solution of the diffusive–ballistic energy equation. Volumetric and surface heat sources are each incorporated separately in the analysis. The material thermal response due to both heat sources during the short heating period is analyzed. It is found that a volumetric heat source resulted in smaller temperature increase in the irradiated material than a surface heat source, despite the same laser power intensity being used in both cases. This is attributed to energy transport mechanisms taking place in the solid substrate due to volumetric and surface heat sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicLaser Material Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207