MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317574159 · doi:10.1227/neu.0b013e3181faaa70

Vidian Nerve Transposition for Endoscopic Endonasal Middle Fossa Approaches

2010· article· en· W2317574159 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOperative Neurosurgery · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Surgical Oncology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSkullTrigeminal nerveOccipital nerve stimulationMaxillary nerveInternal carotid arteryFacial nerveMagnetic resonance imagingSurgeryAnatomyRadiologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The vidian nerve is a landmark for safe identification of the petrous internal carotid artery during endonasal endoscopic approaches (EEAs) to the skull base. The surgical technique classically described involves sacrifice of the nerve. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the feasibility of vidian nerve transposition during EEA. METHODS: After exposure of the vidian canal aperture, the bone is removed along its inferior and medial aspect. Once the depth is understood, determining the position of the internal carotid artery, the bone superior to the vidian nerve is drilled. The vidian nerve can then be transposed from its canal and retracted superiorly, allowing the drill to come inferiorly and to remove the bone lateral to the nerve, finalizing freedom around the vidian nerve. RESULTS: Four patients underwent EEA with vidian transposition. CASE ILLUSTRATION: a 20-year-old woman presented with partial numbness on the left side of the face and some tingling in the face, particularly inside her mouth. Magnetic resonance imaging scans demonstrated a Meckel cave tumor compatible with a left-side trigeminal schwannoma. EEA to the Meckel cave was performed and the vidian nerve was transposed. The tumor was totally resected and the vidian nerve preserved. The patient was discharged home in 2 days, stating improvement in facial sensation without new neurological deficits and denying dry eye. The patient was asymptomatic at the 9-month follow-up. None of the 4 patients who underwent this procedure complained of dry eye during the postoperative period. CONCLUSION: The vidian nerve transposition for EEAs to the skull base is an alternative technique that is feasible and conservative. It seems to be a good option that could prove beneficial to the quality of life of patients after surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.371
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it