MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317596351 · doi:10.2514/6.2006-4629

Systems Design and Performance of Cold Gas Microthruster for Microsatellite Attitude Control

2006· article· en· W2317596351 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Roberto Cocomazzi, Alessandro Avanzi, Dario Modenini, Paolo Tortora

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAttitude controlAstrobiologyEngineeringAerospace engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We discuss our approach to the design and manufacturing of a cold gas micropropulsion system, using micro electromechanical systems (MEMS) devices, for an experimental attitude and orbital control system for the ALMASat microsatellite. ALMASat is a small educational spacecraft entirely designed and assembled in the aerospace laboratories of II School of Engineering of the University of Bologna. Its weight is about 12 kg, carried by a cubical bus (side 30 cm), and it is scheduled for launch from Baikonur (Kazahstan) using the DNEPR Launch Vehicle. The core of the micropropulsion system is a De Laval nozzle which accelerates the fluid, molecular nitrogen, from a plenum, through a 40 micron throat at supersonic velocity. Using the nozzle as a simple cold-gas thruster, good Isp efficiencies are demonstrated, although side-wall boundary layer contamination, no continuity effect and the limitations of MEMS fabrication technologies are clear limiting factors. The micropropulsion system consists of a high pressure tank, a pressure regulator and solenoid valves for the open/close thrusters cycles. The extruded nozzle geometry, made on silicon wafer, has been manufactured in collaboration with the Carlo Gavazzi Space (CGS) and IMM section of the Italian National Research Council (CNR) of Bologna, using a Deep Reactive Ion Etching (DRIE) technique and successive bonding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpacecraft and Cryogenic TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207