A Simple Method to Measure Protein Side-Chain Mobility Using NMR Chemical Shifts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Protein side-chain motions are involved in many important biological processes including enzymatic catalysis, allosteric regulation, and the mediation of protein-protein, protein-DNA, protein-RNA, and protein-cofactor interactions. NMR spectroscopy has long been used to provide insights into the motions of side-chain groups. Currently, the method of choice for studying side-chain dynamics by NMR is the measurement of methyl (2)H autorelaxation. Methyl (2)H autorelaxation exhibits simple relaxation mechanisms and can be straightforwardly converted to meaningful dynamic parameters. However, methyl groups can only be found in 6 of 19 side-chain bearing amino acids. Consequently, only a sparse assessment of protein side-chain dynamics is possible. Therefore, there is a significant interest in developing novel methods of studying side-chain motions that can be applied to all types of side-chains. Here, we show how side-chain chemical shifts can be used to determine the magnitude of fast side-chain motions in proteins. The chemical shift method is applicable to all side-chain bearing residues and does not require any additional measurements beyond standard NMR experiments for backbone and side-chain assignments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".