MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317626455 · doi:10.1115/gt2014-25423

S-Bend Diffuser With Passive Effusion Cooling

2014· article· en· W2317626455 on OpenAlexaff
B. C. N. Ng, A. M. Birk

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiffuser (optics)EffusionMechanicsFlow (mathematics)Volumetric flow rateStatic pressureInletMaterials scienceAirflowAcousticsMedicineEngineeringPhysicsMechanical engineeringOpticsSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the results of an experimental study of passive effusion cooling in an S-bend channel with a diffuser. A previous paper showed the results for cold primary flow [1]. This paper deals with hot primary flow. The results show that different levels and locations of effusion injection significantly affect the primary flow field and the pressure recovery in the downstream diffuser. This leads to a significant increase in static pressure at the inlet of the S-bend section, and reduces the driving pressure for the passive effusion cooling air. This effect then leads to reduced effusion mass flow, momentum and cooling effectiveness. The paper presents data on the static pressure distributions in the device, flow distortion at the diffuser exit, flow rate of effusion injection, and effusion cooling effectiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.606
Threshold uncertainty score0.320

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.160
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeat Transfer MechanismsFrench-language works237,207