Single Molecule Force Spectroscopy Reveals the Molecular Mechanical Anisotropy of the FeS<sub>4</sub> Metal Center in Rubredoxin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mechanical anisotropy is an important feature of materials. Depending on the direction it is pulled, a material can exhibit very different mechanical properties. Mechanical anisotropy on the microscopic scale has also been observed for individual elastomeric proteins. Depending upon the direction along which it is stretched, a protein can unfold via different mechanical unfolding pathways and exhibit vastly different mechanical stability. However, it remains to be demonstrated if the concept of mechanical anisotropy can be extended to the molecular scale for small molecular objects containing only a few chemical bonds. Here, we choose the iron-sulfur center FeS4 in the simplest iron-sulfur protein rubredoxin as a model system to demonstrate the molecular level mechanical anisotropy. We used single molecule atomic force spectroscopy to investigate the mechanical rupture of the FeS4 center along different pulling directions. The FeS4 cluster is a simple molecular object with defined three-dimensional structure, where a ferric ion and four coordinating cysteinyl ligands are arranged into a distorted tetrahedral geometry. Mutating two specific residues in rubredoxin to cysteines provides anchoring points that enable us to stretch and rupture the FeS4 center along five distinct and precisely controlled directions. Our results showed that the mechanical stability as well as the rupture mechanism and kinetics of the FeS4 center are strongly dependent upon the direction along which it is stretched, suggesting that the very small and simple FeS4 center exhibits considerable mechanical anisotropy. It is likely that structural asymmetry in the FeS4 cluster and the modulation of the local environment due to partial unfolding of rubredoxin are responsible for the observed mechanical anisotropy. Our results suggest that mechanical anisotropy is a universal feature for any asymmetrical three-dimensional structure, even down to a molecular scale, and such mechanical anisotropy can be potentially utilized to control the mechanochemical reactivity of molecular objects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".