MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317700656 · doi:10.1190/ice2016-6487030.1

Factors affecting productivity in the Cardium tight light oil play, Alberta, Canada

2016· article· en· W2317700656 on OpenAlexaffabout
Per Kent Pedersen, Holly Nicholas, Raymond Van, Julianne Fic, Adam Fraser

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference and Exhibition, Barcelona, Spain, 3-6 April 2016 · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsConocoPhillips (Canada)University of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProductivityTight oilPetroleum engineeringNatural resource economicsBusinessEnvironmental scienceGeologyEconomicsPaleontologyEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although unconventional type hydrocarbon plays are extensive hydrocarbon accumulations with relatively uniform lateral reservoir properties, they are often characterized by significant variations in both initial and cumulative production. While variations in productivity between wells can often be attributed to differences in drilling and completion, subtle changes in reservoir properties can often have a significant impact on productivity. This presentation will focus on identification of sweet spots within the extensive Cardium Tight Oil Play in western Alberta. Cardium shoreface sandstones and conglomerates contain one of largest conventional oil accumulations within the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin with more than 5 billion barrels of oil reserves. The play was revitalized in 2008 with multistage horizontal wells targeting low porosity and permeability muddy, intensely bioturbated sandstone reservoirs around the halo area of legacy pools, with production exceeding 120,000 bbl/d from these new wells. This study will present a pore to depositional sequence scale reservoir characterization of the unconventional type low permeability, intensely bioturbated muddy sandstone reservoirs. Characteristics of the various halo play areas will be presented and contrasted. Although they contain similar sedimentary facies they have different reservoir properties due to differences in depositional conditions in the offshore environments, burial depth, timing of hydrocarbon charge and post-depositional faulting which resulted in slight differences in bedforms, mud content and type tracefossil assemblages, diagenesis, compaction, cementation, pore types, fluid content and reservoir pressure. It will be shown how these parameters affect productivity and how sweet spots often appear similar on well logs but detailed core examination and analysis reveal these subtle differences. Detailed core observations were complemented with thin section, SEM analysis, and mercury (MICP) data of the various micro facies, i.e. muddy matrix versus sandy borrow fill. Full core diameter CT scanning was used to characterize the 3-D connectivity of the sandstone beds and sandstone filled borrows for each reservoir facies. Due to the small scale and discontinuity of the sandstones beds and borrow fills, routine plug and full diameter core analysis often underestimate the flow capacity of such intensely bioturbated reservoirs, where sand filled borrows provide flow pathways in 3-D.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.390
Threshold uncertainty score0.950

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Conference and Exhibition, Barcelona, Spain, 3-6 April 2016Same topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207