MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317721918 · doi:10.1021/ef500353z

Separation of Toluene-Insoluble Solids in the Slurry Oil from a Residual Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit: Determination of the Solid Content and Sequential Selective Separation of Solid Components

2014· article· en· W2317721918 on OpenAlexaff
Aijun Guo, Zhongxun Wei, Bing Zhao, Kun Chen, Dong Liu, Zongxian Wang, Hua Song

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluid catalytic crackingSlurryTolueneCokeResidual oilExtraction (chemistry)Filtration (mathematics)ChemistrySolventChromatographyMaterials scienceChemical engineeringCatalysisOrganic chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Removing solid impurities inside slurry oil from residual fluidized catalytic cracking (RFCC) is critical for efficient use of its aromatic hydrocarbons, and selective separation of the solid components is also an important issue of recycling valuable resources for catalyst and carbon material. Different separation methods were employed to isolate the solids and their components in the slurry oil from a RFCC unit, and the resultant solids and components were comprehensively characterized by elemental analysis, X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electronic microscopy (SEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis, etc. Results show that the content of toluene-insoluble solids in the slurry oil varies from separation methods employed. The solid components, i.e., catalyst particles and coke powders, can be sequentially separated, and the choice of an appropriate separation method is critical for accurate determination of the solid content in a RFCC slurry oil. When an aliphatic solvent is used for dilution and, after filtering, an aromatic solvent is employed for extraction, the solids can be completely separated and the total content of toluene-insoluble solids is thus obtained. Also, selective separation of the two major components of the solid has also been established. When the slurry oil is digested with hot toluene, followed by filtration and extraction with hot toluene, catalyst particles can be separated at a selectivity of 71.0 wt %. Afterward, when the filtrate is digested with a substantially aliphatic solvent, followed by filtration and extraction with hot toluene, fine coke powders are separated at a selectivity of 96.9 wt %. This selective separation opens a possible way to recover catalyst and obtain fine coke powders as valuable resources from a single RFCC slurry oil. At the same time, the slurry oil may thus be highly clarified, which might find a variety of flexible applications. Finally, the mechanism for particle aggregation and clustering for the efficient separation of solids from heavy oils, such as slurry oil from a fluidized catalytic cracking (FCC)/RFCC unit, has been postulated, where upon adding an aliphatic solvent, heavy asphaltenes precipitate to be adsorbed on the surfaces of fine particles and function as natural binders to aggregate and cluster the fine particles, rendering separation of nanosized coke fines possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.449

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207