MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317733743 · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyv087

Extinction and Radiation: How the Fall of Dinosaurs Led to the Rise of Mammals

2015· article· en· W2317733743 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dumitru T. Murariu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mammalogy · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEvolution and Paleontology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtinction (optical mineralogy)BiologyZoologyGeographyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite the Earth’s immense age, only the last 600 million years have been characterized by remarkable biodiversity. If we accept that theropod dinosaurs were the ancestors of birds, and synapsids the ancestors of mammals, we can easily understand why the Triassic synapsids did not diversify to marsupial+placental mammals, and monotremes until the Jurassic, and why early placental mammals were no larger than shrews even by the end of Cretaceous. Until then, dinosaurs made up 95% of the total biomass of vertebrates through the second half of the Mesozoic; after their mass extinction, mammals radiated dramatically filling all niches of the dinosaurs and even invading new ones. This appears to be the central theme of Archibald’s book. With an extensive breadth of knowledge of recent paleontological discoveries in South America, Europe, and Asia, as well as considerable field experience in the western United States, southern Alberta, and Uzbekistan, Archibald is superbly qualified to draw on his vast experience. As evidenced by this book, he is also clearly unafraid to enter into polemics with other scientists on interpreting the value of recent world-wide mammal discoveries, the book’s central theme. Although unimpressive in length, the book is richly embellished by the information contained. Following a 2-page Preface, the 1st chapter (The Late Cretaceous Nonavian Dinosaur Record) emphasizes the relatively brief Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary, characterized by the extinction of the nonavian dinosaurs. The terms “boundary” and “nonavian” are both clearly explained in the Notes section (pp. 87–92) although there remains controversy in their use. The detailed explanation of necessary conditions and opportunities for fossilization of plants or animals are welcomed in this chapter; the example of Archaeopteryx preserved in limestone is mentioned as well as the role of cataclysmic events. Aside from pterosaurs and ornithischians, Archibald considers all North American Dinosauria. A comprehensive table (1.1) of genera and number of species from the Dinosaur Park Formation also lists those of the Lance Formation, with additions from the Judith River, Two Medicine, and Hell Creek Formations in segments averaging 2–3 million years as well as their taxonomic diversity. Noting the richness of some genera from the Dinosaur Park Formation and their paucity in the Lance Formation (on p. 8), Archibald’s analysis shows a rapid decline of nonavian dinosaurs specially in Mastrichtian. The 2nd chapter (In the Shadow of Nonavian Dinosaurs) is a brief overview of the most ancient mammals emphasizing the scarcity of knowledge on them, and some misleading ideas voiced by recent authorities. Three main ideas emerge in this chapter: 1) mammal-like reptiles originated from synapsids (ca. 300 mya); 2) marsupials did not appear before placental mammals, and hence, are not their ancestors; 3) marsupials are not more primitive than placentals. Some mandibular characteristics (e.g., degree of the dentary angle inflection) support the idea of their being close relatives rather than succession over time. Chapter 3 (In search of Our Most Ancient Eutherian Ancestors) covers the only Late Cretaceous eutherian that has been discovered in both North America and Asia. Archibald utilizes results from his expeditions to Uzbekistan to present cladograms incorporating plesiomorphic and apomorphic features to distinguish the different taxa. His cladistic analyses are meritorious and in many cases confirm results from DNA sequencing analysis. Chapter 4 (Patterns of Extinction at the K/T Boundary) is dedicated to each major clade of fossils, before and after Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary, mostly from northern parts of interior western North America. Mammaliaformes—Prototheria, Metatheria and Eutheria—survived this boundary. At this time, multituberculates flourished and in the Western interior, some species persisted up to the Middle Tertiary; others disappeared earlier. The eutherians survived in greatest percentage, and many Tertiary relatives are derived from them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.008
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of MammalogySame topicEvolution and Paleontology StudiesFrench-language works237,207