MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317740749 · doi:10.2514/6.2015-2282

Trajectory optimization algorithm for a constant altitude cruise flight with a required time of arrival constraint

2015· article· en· W2317740749 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandre Liv, Radu Ioan Dancila, Ruxandra Mihaela Botez

Bibliographic record

Venue15th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAir Traffic Management and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCruiseTrajectoryConstraint (computer-aided design)Constant (computer programming)Altitude (triangle)Computer scienceTrajectory optimizationTime constraintTime of arrivalAlgorithmArrival timeAir traffic controlControl theory (sociology)Aerospace engineeringMathematical optimizationMathematicsEngineeringPhysicsArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsControl (management)Transport engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Decreasing the flight costs, therefore flying along the optimal for a trajectory, is a constant preoccupation for all aircraft operators. Moreover, the reduction of fuel consumption and pollutant emissions is a significant factor in the trajectory optimization analysis. The study presented in this article is part of the research conducted at the Laboratoire de recherche en commande active, avionique et aeroservoelasticite (LARCASE), at Ecole de Technologie Superieure, in the field of aircraft trajectory optimization algorithms for Flight Management System platforms, and investigates an optimization algorithm for a leveled cruise flight segment with required time of arrival constraint. The proposed algorithm is deterministic, in accordance with the requirements for avionics equipment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue15th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations ConferenceSame topicAir Traffic Management and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207