MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317851291 · doi:10.1021/je500340b

Solubility Measurements for the N<sub>2</sub> + CO<sub>2</sub> + H<sub>2</sub>O System under Hydrate–Liquid–Vapor Equilibrium

2014· article· en· W2317851291 on OpenAlexaff
Francis Lang, Phillip Servio

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical & Engineering Data · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolubilityChemistryMole fractionHydrateClathrate hydrateThermodynamicsSolubility equilibriumVapor pressurePhase equilibriumThermodynamic equilibriumAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Physical chemistryChromatographyOrganic chemistryPhase (matter)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Equilibrium liquid and gas mole fraction measurements were taken at hydrate–liquid–vapor equilibrium for the N 2 + CO 2 + H 2 O system. Experimental conditions ranged from 275.1 K to 279.2 K and from 2.7 MPa to 14 MPa. Gaseous mole fractions were compared to literature values to validate that equilibrium was reached. The effect of temperature and pressure changes on the solubility of both gas hydrate formers along isotherms is reported. The thermodynamic region associated with a hydrate structure change affected solubility trends.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical & Engineering DataSame topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207