MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Age Does Not Influence Mitochondrial-Related Transcript Expression Following A Resistance-Training Bout

2011· article· en· W2317855663 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel I. Ogborn, Bryon R. McKay, Justin D. Crane, Gianni Parise, Mark A. Tarnopolsky

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnabolismLeg pressResistance trainingMedicineInternal medicineMuscle atrophyLean body massCreatine kinaseEndocrinologyAtrophyEndurance trainingSarcopeniaSkeletal muscleBody weight

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mitochondrial dysfunction has been theorized to contribute to age-associated muscle atrophy. Deficits in muscle mass are thought to be due to a degree of anabolic resistance to growth-promoting stimuli; however, it is not known whether mitochondrial dysfunction contributes to an impaired synthetic response following resistance exercise. While long-term resistance training has been shown to influence mitochondrial transcripts, the acute response has not been well characterized. PURPOSE: To determine the ability of a single resistance-training bout to alter mitochondrial-related transcript abundance and whether such a response is influenced by age. METHODS: 19 younger (YNG; n=10, 21±3 y) and older (OLD; n=9, 70±4 y) sedentary males completed a single unilateral resistance-training bout for the knee extensors (four sets of 10 repetitions at 75%1RM for leg extension and leg press exercises). Muscle biopsies were taken from the unexercised leg to establish baseline measures and from the exercised leg at three, 24 and 48 hours post exercise along with blood from the antecubital vein. RESULTS: Both groups had similar lean body mass (66.0±10.8 kg YNG; 62.9±6.4 kg OLD); however OLD had reduced strength (leg press: 228±94 lbs YNG; 161±50 lbs OLD; leg extension: 117±47 lbs YNG; 82±23 lbs OLD; p<0.05). Serum creatine kinase was elevated over baseline to a similar extent for both groups at 24 and 48 h post-exercise (289±153% at 24h, 267±161% 48 h; p<0.001). PGC-1α mRNA increased three h post-exercise (441±274%, p<0.01), while Tfam mRNA was elevated at 24 h (123±29.5%, p<0.05). In contrast, ND1 and ND4 mRNA were repressed 48 h after exercise (82±60% and 63±26% of baseline, p<0.05). No effects of age were noted except for ND4 mRNA, where expression in YNG was elevated relative to OLD 24 h post-exercise (154±57%, p<0.05), before dropping to a repressed level similar to the older group at 48 h. CONCLUSION: Age does not appear to influence the dynamics of the PGC-1α, Tfam and ND1 mRNA response to a single resistance-training bout. Further work is required to clarify the significance of the signaling pathways responsible for the induction of PGC-1α, and whether this results in the co-activation of proteins responsible for the induction of mitochondrial adaptations to exercise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicMuscle Physiology and Disorders→French-language works237,207→