MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2317857961 · doi:10.1190/1.3627746

On the calibration of a fast S‐transform with application to AVF inversion of anelastic reflectivity

2011· article· en· W2317857961 on OpenAlexaff
Chris Bird, K. A. Innanen, Laurence R. Lines, Mostafa Naghizadeh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInversion (geology)Reflection (computer programming)AmplitudeImpulse responseCalibrationReflection coefficientGeologyComputer scienceSeismologyPhysicsOpticsMathematicsStatisticsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The S- transform is a time- frequency decomposition technique with a wide range of applications in seismic signal analysis. However it has been under- used due to the high computational cost needed to employ it. In this paper we present a fast, non-redundant S- transform (FST). The ability of the FST to provide high fidelity estimates of reflection seismic amplitudes is tested in this paper. Where the FST cannot provide accurate estimates of amplitudes, we calibrate it by normalizing the unit impulse response of the algorithm. Strongly dispersive reflection coefficients associated with highly absorptive, hydrocarbon charged targets, have been observed in seismic data. A frequency by frequency method (AVF) for determining Q of a highly absorptive target from measurements of the dispersive reflection coefficient has been developed to invert data variations of this kind. In order to implement the AVF technique to invert for Q, it is necessary that we have a method of estimating the local spectrum of the reflection coefficient. We develop a method of implementing AVF inversion by using the calibrated FST to estimate the local spectrum of dispersive reflection coefficients. We test the effectiveness of the FST for estimating the spectrum of reflection coefficients by comparing with the analytic reflection coefficient as calculated by a fast Fourier transform. Using forward modeling to generate synthetic traces containing absorptive reflection coefficients, we observe accurate results of the AVF inversion for a range of Q values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques→French-language works237,207→