MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317864287 · doi:10.1109/map.2015.2501240

FPC Antennas: C-band point-to-point communication systems

2016· article· en· W2317864287 on OpenAlexaff
Bybi P. Chacko, Gijo Augustin, Tayeb A. Denidni

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntenna (radio)Microstrip antennaOpticsAperture (computer memory)Antenna measurementBroadbandElectrical impedanceFrequency bandAntenna factorMicrostripPatch antennaAcousticsPhysicsMaterials scienceEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A high-gain wide-band Fabry-Perot cavity (FPC) antenna is presented for C-band point-to-point communication systems. The proposed antenna utilizes a broadband aperture-coupled microstrip antenna (ACMA) as the source and multilayer frequency-selective surfaces (FSSs) as the superstrate. The experimental result shows that the proposed antenna achieves an impedance band from 4 to 5.4 GHz (30%) for ${\rm S}_{{\rm 11}}{\rm \leq-10}$ dB. The wide band is obtained through the merging of different resonance frequencies due to the patch, the coupling aperture, and the superstrate layer. The antenna also facilitates an enhanced broadside gain up to 14.2 dBi at 4.8 GHz with variations of less than 4 dB throughout the operating band by loading three layers of FSS superstrate. Furthermore, a parametric study is performed to provide antenna engineers with information about the design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Antennas and Propagation MagazineSame topicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207