The Lockheed Martin Crew Exploration Vehicle System Requirements, Alternative Concepts and Development Approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The President’s Vision for U.S. Space Exploration outlines a sustainable and affordable human and robotic program to extend human presence across the solar system and beyond. This paper describes Lockheed Martin’s spiral development approach to the Crew Exploration Vehicle, a cornerstone segment in NASA’s system-of-systems implementation of that vision. Fundamental system requirements such as safety, mission function and duration, crew size, launch vehicle capability, and level of autonomy are derived from the reference exploration architecture. Human-rating requirements, including abort during all mission phases, safe haven from radiation and other hazardous environments, and redundancy are addressed. Alternative operations and vehicle concepts are presented and evaluated against the standardized set of safety and mission success, effectiveness, extensibility and affordability figures of merit. Near term technology requirements are identified and program risks are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it