MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317914309 · doi:10.1149/1.2981108

Investigation of Microencapsulated Laccase as Enzyme Immobilization Template for Application in Bio-fuel Cell

2008· article· en· W2317914309 on OpenAlexafffund
Mathieu Hébert, Dominic Rochefort

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrochemical sensors and biosensors
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversité de MontréalFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsGlassy carbonEthyleneiminePassivationElectrochemistryChemistryLaccaseElectrodeAdsorptionRedoxNuclear chemistryConductive polymerPolymerChemical engineeringMaterials scienceInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryEnzymeCyclic voltammetryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electrochemical behavior of microencapsulated laccase with a non-conductive polymer (poly(ethyleneimine), PEI) adsorbed on a glassy carbon electrode (GC) had been investigated. A Km value of 76 μM and a sensitivity of 16.6 {plus minus} 0.1 nA/μM with a response time of 7.5 s had been determined for a laccase microencapsulated with PEI that was deposited on a bare GC electrode in a McIlvaine buffer at pH = 5.75 with p-phenylenediamine (PPD). The bioelectrode has found to have a permeability, Pm, of 4.9 E-4 cm s^-1 for PPD and too strong interactions with 2,2-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonate) acid to observe any diffusion processes. The electrochemical and enzymatic oxidation of PPD was studied under various conditions to evaluate its reversibility and stability as a suitable redox mediator. RDE experiments showed a passivation for a glassy carbon electrode modified with empty poly(ethyleneimine) microcapsules under static conditions. Under hydrodynamic conditions however, the passivation was slowed down.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.415

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicElectrochemical sensors and biosensorsFrench-language works237,207