MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317920419 · doi:10.1093/notesj/gjs296

Cowper's 'Light Propitious'

2013· article· en· W2317920419 on OpenAlexaff
Tom Keymer, John D. Baird

Bibliographic record

VenueNotes and Queries · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicLaw, logistics, and international trade
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVolume (thermodynamics)HistoryArt historyArtPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IN the devastating closing stanza of ‘The Cast-Away’, which compares the poet’s spiritual despair with the plight of a drowning mariner (and to the mariner’s advantage), ‘No voice divine the storm allay’d, | No light propitious shone’. Attention to the poem’s intertextual dimension has focused on Richard Walter’s account of a seaman helplessly ‘canted over-board’ in A Voyage Round the World…by George Anson, Esq. (1748), which Cowper may have read decades earlier.1 For the lines quoted above from the poem’s conclusion, which makes explicit the application to Cowper’s own predicament, more than one commentator has noted an allusion to the stilling of the storm narrated in Matthew 8:23–6, and/or to related biblical texts (Mark 4:39; Psalms 117:29).2 Yet Cowper’s is a storm that nothing stills, and he emphasizes the point with a further allusion, this time to William Falconer’s immensely popular, though now largely forgotten, narrative poem The Shipwreck (1762). As Janet Sorensen has recently observed of The Shipwreck’s international currency well into the nineteenth century, Falconer’s poem ‘went through over 100 editions … and was anthologized alongside poetry of Milton and Pope in collections of “great English poets” ’. It draws on the author’s personal experience of surviving a maritime disaster in which most of his crewmates drowned, and mixes sublime diction with sentimental techniques ‘To wake to sympathy the feeling heart’.3

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.009
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNotes and QueriesSame topicLaw, logistics, and international tradeFrench-language works237,207