MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317939074 · doi:10.1109/embc.2014.6944477

Image enhancement and space-variant color reproduction method for endoscopic images using adaptive sigmoid function

2014· article· en· W2317939074 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Enhancement Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChrominanceArtificial intelligenceColor spaceComputer visionRGB color modelComputer scienceLuminanceSigmoid functionColor imagePixelMathematicsImage (mathematics)Image processingArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an image enhancement and space-variant color reproduction method based on adaptive sigmoid function for endoscopic image. At first, using YCBCR conversion matrix, the color image is separated into luminance and chrominance components. The adaptive sigmoid function with two controlling parameters is applied on the uniformly distributed luminance pixels. The space-variant color reproduction generates new chrominance components by transferring and modifying old chrominance based on texture information. Finally, new luminance and chrominance components are converted into RGB color image. The proposed method highlights some of the tissue and vascular characteristics as well as pit patterns in lesion and polyp. The performance of the proposed scheme is compared with other related methods in terms of image quality, focus value, efficiency of color reproduction and statistic of visual representation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.274
Threshold uncertainty score0.717

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage Enhancement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207