MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317946574 · doi:10.2514/6.2009-954

Unstructured High-Order Accurate Finite-Volume Solutions of the Navier-Stokes Equations

2009· article· en· W2317946574 on OpenAlexaff
Chris Michalak, Carl Ollivier‐Gooch

Bibliographic record

Venue47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite volume methodNavier–Stokes equationsVolume (thermodynamics)Computer scienceOrder (exchange)Applied mathematicsMechanicsMathematicsPhysicsCompressibilityThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A nite-volume scheme utilizing a fourth-order reconstruction for convective and di usive uxes of the Navier-Stokes equations is presented. The reconstruction is obtained e ciently by precomputing the pseudo-inverse of the reconstruction matrix. Viscous boundary conditions are handled by introducing additional rows in the reconstruction matrices. Rapid convergence of steady-state problems is made possible by computing the exact ux Jacobian and the use of a Newton-GMRES algorithm. A grid convergence study of cylindrical Couette ow is used to demonstrate the order of accuracy of the scheme. Laminar ow over an airfoil on a sequence of anisotropic grids is also used to qualitatively demonstrate the superior accuracy of the fourth-order scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace ExpositionSame topicComputational Fluid Dynamics and AerodynamicsFrench-language works237,207