MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317960525 · doi:10.1093/qjmam/hbt010

Plane deformations of a composite with interacting harmonic inclusions in the presence of non-uniform loading

2013· article· en· W2317960525 on OpenAlexafffund
Xu Wang, Peter Schiavone

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Material Mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsConformal mapTraction (geology)Mathematical analysisInvariant (physics)Matrix (chemical analysis)Displacement (psychology)GeometryAiry functionComposite numberPlane (geometry)MathematicsConstant (computer programming)Stress fieldMaterials sciencePhysicsComposite materialGeologyComputer scienceFinite element method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider plane deformations of a composite material containing two interacting elastic inclusions of irregular shape which do not disturb the first invariant of an applied non-uniform stress field at infinity (so-called ‘harmonic inclusions’). Our analysis is based on a conformal map which maps the matrix region outside the two inclusions onto an annulus in the mapped plane. The unknown coefficients in the mapping function are uniquely determined via the continuity conditions of traction and displacement across the two inclusion-matrix interfaces. In our design, the two inclusions may have different and arbitrary elastic constants and the hoop stress remains constant along each of the two inclusion-matrix interfaces from the matrix side. The results are illustrated graphically. The set of permissible parameters leading to a one-to-one mapping is also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied MathematicsSame topicComposite Material MechanicsFrench-language works237,207