MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317962200 · doi:10.1308/rcsann.2014.96.3.250

A method for the placement of the ceramic liner in an uncemented cup

2014· article· en· W2317962200 on OpenAlexaff
Amit Atrey, Zachary Morison, J. Waite, S. K. Young

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMedicineDentistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The correct seating of a ceramic liner is integral to the hip's survival, 1 with malseating being associated with ceramic fracture and earlier wear rates. 2 A simple technique for seating the spherical ceramic liner is illustrated in Figure The liner is introduced with one finger in the rim. It is lifted upwards (cranially) with some pressure, aligning the taper of the liner against the taper of the cup (force 1). Once the tapers are strictly parallel, the liner can be introduced by gliding it into the cup (force 2) while maintaining cranial pressure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.244
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of The Royal College of Surgeons of EnglandSame topicOrthopaedic implants and arthroplastyFrench-language works237,207