MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317965941 · doi:10.1021/om400084b

Secondary Kinetic Isotope Effects in Oxidative Addition of Benzyl Bromide to Dimethylplatinum(II) Complexes

2013· article· en· W2317965941 on OpenAlexafffund
Marzieh Dadkhah Aseman, Mehdi Rashidi, S. Masoud Nabavizadeh, Richard J. Puddephatt

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganometallics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicChemical Reactions and Isotopes
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaShiraz University
KeywordsChemistryKinetic isotope effectSN2 reactionDeuteriumBenzeneBenzyl bromideBromideOxidative additionLigand (biochemistry)Kinetic energyMedicinal chemistryPhysical chemistryInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The secondary α-deuterium kinetic isotope effects (KIEs), ( k H / k D ) α, have been determined, at different temperatures and in solvents having different polarities, for reaction of PhCH 2 Br/PhCD 2 Br with the dimethylplatinum(II) complexes [PtMe 2 (NN)], in which the bidentate NN ligand is bpy (=2,2′-bipyridine) or bu 2 bpy (=4,4′-di- tert -butyl-2,2′-bipyridine). The values obtained for the secondary α-deuterium KIEs in acetone solution are close to 1 and may be normal or inverse, but much larger values are found for the reactions in benzene. An explanation is presented on the basis of solvent dependence of the degree of looseness of the transition state in the S N 2 mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganometallicsSame topicChemical Reactions and IsotopesFrench-language works237,207