MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317978838 · doi:10.1061/41016(314)118

Confederation Bridge Ice Force Monitoring

2008· article· en· W2317978838 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructures Congress 2008 · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInstrumentation (computer programming)Data acquisitionBridge (graph theory)Ice formationRemote sensingEngineeringComputer scienceGeologyAtmospheric sciences

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper provides a summary of the ice force monitoring program and the results that have been obtained since Confederation Bridge opened in 1997. The paper summarizes the rationale for an ice force monitoring system, the objectives of the system, and describes the instrumentation and associated data acquisition system. Summaries of the results are then presented in the form of the observations related to the behaviour of the ice against the instrumented piers, the ice data that has been observed/measured and summarizes the statistics associated with these ice observations. These observations include information on the effectiveness of the conical piers in clearing ice and the forms of ice failure that have been observed. The paper describes the process by which ice loads are determined from the instrumentation data, and summarizes the results related to ice forces and pressures. Finally, the paper describes an extreme ice loading event.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.346
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it