MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2318005565 · doi:10.2749/222137810796062860

Montreal – Aquatic Complex for 2005 FINA World Championships

2010· article· en· W2318005565 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stefan Zmigrodzki

Bibliographic record

VenueReport · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderground infrastructure and sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman settlementConsolidation (business)Civil engineeringEnvironmental scienceEngineeringGeotechnical engineeringBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The existing open air aquatic complex on Sainte-Hélène Island in Montréal was chosen to host 2005 Aquatic Sports World Championships. The old concrete pools built in 1953 had to be replaced by new structures and the new pools and bleachers had to fit in the existing site. In the new layout, the swimming pool was relocated which led to some problems due to soil conditions. The soil was sensitive and heterogeneous therefore differential settlements and resulting lateral displacements had to be considered in the design in order to respect the strict dimensional criteria for Olympic pools. To guarantee the quality of works within a very tight schedule, the upper section of the walls was made of prefabricated steel panels. As a result, the rigid continuous “box” originally formed by the concrete corridor around the pool was lost. Consequently, a combination of soil consolidation, interaction of soil-structure and phasing of construction-backfilling became part of design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.295
Threshold uncertainty score0.594

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1230.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReportSame topicUnderground infrastructure and sustainabilityFrench-language works237,207