MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2318006740 · doi:10.1149/1.2424307

Characterization and Growth Mechanism of Filamentous Zinc Electrodeposits

2007· article· en· W2318006740 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrodeposition and Electroless Coatings
Canadian institutionsTeck (Canada)University of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsZincateScanning electron microscopeZincMicrometerTransmission electron microscopyBET theoryMaterials scienceMorphology (biology)Selected area diffractionNanometreSpecific surface areaDiffractionMineralogyChemistryCrystallographyNanotechnologyMetallurgyComposite materialGeologyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The morphology of mossy zinc deposits from alkaline zincate solutions was investigated using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and a transmission electron microscope (TEM). The composition and orientation of the mossy deposits were examined using powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), and selected area XRD (SAD). Morphologically, the deposits appear as spongy at the micrometer scale, but filamentous at the nanometer scale. Filamentous mossy zinc was determined to consist of pure metallic zinc. Individual deposit filaments were found to be single crystals which grow in the <0001> direction. The BET specific surface area of filamentous deposits was determined to be 5-11 m2 g-1 (BET). This high surface area makes filaments highly active and can spontaneously oxidize in the air.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.613
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it