MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2318022415 · doi:10.1056/nejm200103293441307

Interactions among Drugs for HIV and Opportunistic Infections

2001· review· en· W2318022415 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNew England Journal of Medicine · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDrugHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Intensive care medicineOpportunistic infectionAntiretroviral therapyAntiretroviral drugImmunologyViral diseasePharmacologyViral load

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drug interactions are an important factor in the treatment of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. The complexity of current drug regimens for such patients requires that clinicians recognize and manage drug interactions. Antiretroviral drug regimens typically consist of three or four antiretroviral drugs but may include even more. In addition, patients may receive other drugs for supportive care, treatment of opportunistic infections, and immunomodulation, as well as alternative drugs obtained from health care providers other than their primary provider. Drug interactions are often unavoidable in HIV-infected patients because of the drug classes involved and the number of drugs . . .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.824

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it