Pregnancy outcomes and factors associated with voluntary pregnancy termination in women who had been treated for acne with isotretinoin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to study the pregnancy outcomes of women exposed to isotretinoin and to identify the factors influencing their decision to request an abortion. METHODS: The study prospectively identified 79 women who had been treated for acne with isotretinoin during the periconceptional period, and who were followed up until completion of their pregnancy. Characteristics of exposure and doses were self-reported by participants. RESULTS: Of the 56 participants who decided to continue their pregnancy, there were 11 spontaneous abortions and 44 women who delivered healthy full-term babies of which 19 had been exposed to isotretinoin <1 month before conception or during pregnancy. In a nominal logistic regression analysis including 68 patients who provided adequate information for analysis, exposure to isotretinoin >2 weeks post-conception and pregnancy termination recommended by the first-contact physician were found to be significantly associated with patients' decision to undergo elective abortion: adjusted OR = 9.87 (95% CI 1.18-82.34) and 12.51 (95% CI 2.36-66.29), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reports an elevated rate of babies born without evidence of gross malformation or neurofunctional abnormality even tough exposure occurred during the teratogenic risk period. However, caution is recommended since a substantial risk of congenital malformations has been reported with low doses of isotretinoin and at exposures limited to early pregnancy. We also found that primary-care physicians may influence patients' decision to request pregnancy termination independently of their timing of exposure to isotretinoin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".