Effect of Wind Tunnel Wall Adaptation on Flow Development Over a Circular Cylinder
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of wall adaptation on flow development over a circular cylinder was investigated in an adaptive-wall wind tunnel. Flow over a circular cylinder with model blockage ratio of 17% was characterized via hot-wire velocity measurements and timeresolved surface pressure measurements. Measurements were made in three wall configurations: geometrically straight walls (GSW), aerodynamically straight walls (ASW), and streamlined walls (SLW). In GSW, the measured pressure drag was significantly greater than that obtained in SLW, which matched published experimental results at low blockage ratios. Blockage effects in GSW, such as flow acceleration and wake blockage, were reduced in ASW and even more so in the SLW configuration. The increase in Strouhal number observed in GSW and ASW was rectified to the expected value in SLW. The results suggest that while both the vortex shedding frequency and the shear layer instability frequency were higher in GSW due to blockage effects, the ratio of these frequencies was constant in all the wall configurations investigated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it