MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2318128338 · doi:10.2514/6.2015-2067

Practical Bonded Joint Stress Analysis

2015· article· en· W2318128338 on OpenAlexaff
Carl Rouseau

Bibliographic record

Venue56th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Behavior of Composites
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJoint (building)Stress (linguistics)Computer scienceAutomationSimplicityAdhesiveStructural engineeringReliability engineeringMechanical engineeringEngineeringMaterials scienceLayer (electronics)Composite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adhesive bonded joints enable unitization of aircraft structures with potential for significant weight and cost savings. Achieving this goal requires an in-depth understanding of the stress distribution in the adherends and the bondlines. The objective of this paper is to review closed-form bonded joint stress field solution in the open literature, evaluate various assumptions and statements from the authors, and suggest options for balancing speed/simplicity against accuracy, with a view toward automation of the generic bonded structural joint analysis problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue56th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials ConferenceSame topicMechanical Behavior of CompositesFrench-language works237,207