MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2318183534 · doi:10.3917/rhps.007.0010

La protection de l’enfance à l’Hospice Saint-Joseph des Sœurs Grises de Montréal (1815–1911)

2015· article· fr· W2318183534 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marie-Christine Giroux

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d histoire de la protection sociale · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans la seconde moitié du XIX e siècle à Montréal, Olivier Berthelet, un bourgeois canadien-français, fonde l’Hospice Saint-Joseph de Montréal. Il passe par la suite aux mains des Sœurs Grises qui y accueillent principalement des « orphelines ». Dans le cadre de la société patriarcale, où les femmes sont généralement reléguées à la sphère privée, ces sœurs parviennent néanmoins à administrer leur institution. Elles offrent aux nombreux enfants qu’elles accueillent dans des conditions précaires, un toit, de la nourriture, une vie disciplinée réglée par la religion catholique et fondée sur une éducation qui respecte les valeurs associées au rôle « maternel » des femmes et à la hiérarchie des classes sociales. Bien que les sœurs y respectent ces valeurs promulguées par les élites de l’époque, l’hospice ne s’est pas révélé être une institution d’enfermement qui visait principalement à discipliner les familles pauvres, mais plutôt un lieu ouvert, qui tentait de s’adapter aux besoins matériels, familiaux, éducatifs et spirituels des familles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d histoire de la protection socialeSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207