MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2318188489 · doi:10.1097/ncq.0b013e3181b40aaa

Endnote...

2009· article· en· W2318188489 on OpenAlexaff
Carolyn Hope Smeltzer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nursing Care Quality · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Canadian institutionsPricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth careLibrary scienceManagementEngineeringPolitical scienceComputer scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PricewaterhouseCoopers, Chicago, Illinois, and Advocate Health Care, Oak Brook, Illinois, and Sisters of Charity Leavenworth Health System, Lenexa, Kansas and Memorial Health Care System (CHI), Chattanogga, Tennessee, and Carondelet Health Network (Ascension), Tucson, Arizona. Corresponding Author: Carolyn Hope Smeltzer, EdD, RN, FAAN, FACHE, PricewaterhouseCoopers, One North Wacker, Chicago, IL 60606 ([email protected]).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.384
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6160.417

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.182
GPT teacher head0.590
Teacher spread0.408 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nursing Care QualitySame topicPrimary Care and Health OutcomesFrench-language works237,207