MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2318190280 · doi:10.1149/1.3377105

Passivation of Deep Levels at the SiO<sub>2</sub>/SiC Interface

2010· article· en· W2318190280 on OpenAlexaff
A. F. Basile, John Rozen, X.D. Chen, Sarit Dhar, John R. Williams, L. C. Feldman, P. M. Mooney

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnnealing (glass)PassivationMaterials scienceTrappingCapacitorOxideOptoelectronicsSilicon carbideSemiconductorInterface (matter)NanotechnologyElectrical engineeringComposite materialMetallurgyLayer (electronics)Voltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The analysis of trapping phenomena in 4H- and 6H-SiC MOS capacitors from C-V and CCDLTS measurements is presented. Three categories of defect levels are distinguished: namely, oxide traps, semiconductor bulk traps, and interface states. NO annealing results in a dramatic decrease of the density of the interface states and the oxide traps in both polytypes, but does not reduce that of the SiC bulk traps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.413

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207