An Update on Self-Regulation in the Legal Profession (1989–2000): Funnel In and Funnel Out
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé L'article analyse le traitement des plaintes contre des avocats par le système disciplinaire de la Law Society de la Colombie Britannique, de 1989 à 2000. Il pose aussi un regard sur les contextes changeants dans lesquels ce système a opéré entre le moment d'une enquête antérieure (1978 à 1988) et celle-ci. Le traitement réservé aux plaintes est examiné dans une perspective qui tient compte de la manière dont elles sont entrées ( funnel in ) et ensuite réduites en nombre par le système disciplinaire ( funnel out ). Finalement, l'avenir de l'autorégulation est évalué à la lumière de négociations et d'ajustements de l'autorégulation de la profession qui se sont produits ailleurs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it