Coronary Artery Involvement in Takayasu Arteritis in 45 Chinese Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the clinical characteristics, potential difficulties in diagnosis, and therapy for coronary artery involvement in patients with Takayasu arteritis (TA). METHODS: Of 587 consecutive patients hospitalized with TA from 1998 to 2011, those found to have > 50% reduction of diameter of coronary artery by angiography were recruited. We defined the first finding of coronary involvement as baseline. The clinical features, laboratory data, coronary angiographic findings, treatment, and followup outcomes were summarized retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 45 (7.7%, 45/587) patients with coronary involvement were identified, including 40 with typical angina, and 15 with myocardial infarction. Some had complications such as peripheral vascular murmur, pulseless disease, and hypertension. The average age at onset of cardiac symptoms was 40.3 ± 12.8 years (range 15-64) and 36 were female. At admission, erythrocyte sedimentation rates were elevated in 27 patients (60%) and C-reactive protein levels in 23 (51.1%). The ostia (37.4%) and proximal segments (33.3%) of coronary artery were most frequently involved. The treatment was stent implantation in 10 patients and coronary artery bypass grafting in 13. One female patient suffered sudden death during the angiography. During a mean followup of 5.8 ± 4.5 years, 8 patients died. CONCLUSION: Coronary artery involvement in TA that leads to cardiovascular events, especially to cardiovascular death, is not rare. Early diagnosis and therapy should be emphasized.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".