A Study in the Mecahnical and Thermodynamical Responses of Cells to Altered Gravity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mechanical and thermodynamical effects of gravity should be present in various cell systems where large objects such as plastids move from cell to cell or ribosomes within cells. Furthermore, in the presence of the gravitational field of a primary body i.e. a planet the gravity vector can result to numerous effects some of which are tension, shear and finally torque. In this paper, we study the mechanical/thermodynamical effects of cell by extending Nace’s torque model. On the surface of the Earth we correct gravity for oblateness and rotation. Similarly, in orbit around Earth the J2 harmonic is included. We derive analytical expressions and study the resulting torque effects for various geocentric latitudes as well as circular and elliptical orbits of various eccentricities and inclinations. We find that elliptical polar orbits result to higher torques, and that high eccentricities increase the torque effects in cells drastically. Finally, we propose the use of quartz electronic micro-resonators as precision thermometers, in a calorimetric detection of the cell’s internal temperature increase resulting from the cell power output related to the applied torque.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".