MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2318267289 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2010-0006

PERFORMANCE AND ENERGY BALANCE OF A LOW HEAT REJECTION DIESEL ENGINE OPERATED WITH DIESEL FUEL AND ETHANOL BLEND

2010· article· en· W2318267289 on OpenAlex
Murat Ciniviz

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsTurbochargerDiesel engineAutomotive engineeringMaterials scienceDiesel fuelCylinder headExhaust gas recirculationEngine efficiencyEngine powerBrake specific fuel consumptionIntegrated engine pressure ratioCylinderTurbinePetrol engineInternal combustion engineEnvironmental sciencePower (physics)CombustionCombustion chamberExternal combustion engineChemistryMechanical engineeringEngineeringThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, it was aimed to investigate the effect of ceramic coating on a turbocharged diesel engine performance and energy balance. For this purpose, cylinder head, valves and pistons of the engine were coated with yttria stabilized zirconia layer with a thickness of 0.35 mm nickel-chromium- aluminium bond coat, as well as the atmospheric plasma spray coating method with a thickness of 0.15 mm. Then, the engines were tested for full load. The heating values of the diesel fuel and ethanol were 46.2 and 25.182 MJ/kg, respectively. Because of the lower heating values of the ethanol, compared with the diesel fuel, it appears to have lower following to engine power, torque and SFC. Compare to engine power of SDE, LHRe has increased about 2%, LHReth has decreased about 22% at all engine speed. Compare to engine torque of SDE, LHRe has increased about 2.5%, LHReth has decreased about 23 % at all engine speeds. Compare to SFC of SDE, LHRe has decreased about 1.1 %, LHReth has increased about 54 % at all engine speeds. Compare to exhaust turbine inlet temperature of SDE, LHRe has increased about 15 %, LHReth has decreased about 17 % at all engine speeds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.614
Threshold uncertainty score0.628

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it