MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2318276946 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.81.055503

Toward precise<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>values for the superallowed<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>0</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>0</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>decays of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math>nuclides: The masses of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>,<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>,<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>, and<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>

2010· article· lv· W2318276946 on OpenAlexaff
C. Wrede, Jason A. Clark, C. M. Deibel, T. Faestermann, R. Hertenberger, A. Parikh, H.-F. Wirth, S. Bishop, A. A. Chen, K. Eppinger, A. Garcı́a, R. Krücken, O. Lepyoshkina, Georg Rugel, K. Setoodehnia

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review C · 2010
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsPhysicsAtomic physicsDipoleQuadrupoleCrystallographyQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-precision measurements of superallowed ${0}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{0}^{+}$ $\ensuremath{\beta}$ decays of $T=2$ nuclides such as $^{20}\mathrm{Mg}$, $^{24}\mathrm{Si}$, $^{28}\mathrm{S}$, and $^{32}\mathrm{Ar}$ can contribute to searches for physics beyond the standard model of particle physics if the ${Q}_{\mathrm{EC}}$ values are accurate to a few keV or better. As a step toward providing precise ${Q}_{\mathrm{EC}}$ values for these decays, the ground-state masses of the respective daughter nuclei $^{20}\mathrm{Na}$, $^{24}\mathrm{Al}$, $^{28}\mathrm{P}$, and $^{32}\mathrm{Cl}$ have been determined by measuring the ($^{3}\mathrm{He},t$) reactions leading to them with the $^{36}\mathrm{Ar}$($^{3}\mathrm{He},t$)$^{36}\mathrm{K}$ reaction as a calibration. A quadrupole-dipole-dipole-dipole (Q3D) magnetic spectrograph was used together with thin ion-implanted carbon-foil targets of $^{20}\mathrm{Ne}$, $^{24}\mathrm{Mg}$, $^{28}\mathrm{Si}$, $^{32}\mathrm{S}$, and $^{36}\mathrm{Ar}$. The masses of $^{20}\mathrm{Na}$ and $^{32}\mathrm{Cl}$ are found to be in good agreement with the values from the 2003 Atomic Mass Evaluation (AME03) [G. Audi, A. H. Wapstra, and C. Thibault, Nucl. Phys. A 729, 337 (2003)], and the precision has been improved by a factor of 6 in both cases. The masses of $^{24}\mathrm{Al}$ and $^{28}\mathrm{P}$ are found to be higher than the values from AME03 by 9.5 keV ($3.2\ensuremath{\sigma}$) and 11.5 keV ($3.6\ensuremath{\sigma}$), respectively, and the precision has been improved by a factor of 2.5 in both cases. The new $^{32}\mathrm{Cl}$ mass is used together with the excitation energy of its lowest $T=2$ level and the mass of $^{32}\mathrm{Ar}$ to derive an improved superallowed ${Q}_{\mathrm{EC}}$ value of 6087.3(22) keV for this case. The effects on quantities related to standard-model tests including the $\ensuremath{\beta}$-$\ensuremath{\nu}$ correlation coefficient $a$ and the isospin-symmetry-breaking correction ${\ensuremath{\delta}}_{C}$ are examined for the $A=32$ case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score0.593

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.006
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0180.025
Open science0.0090.010
Research integrity0.0050.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1770.211

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207