MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2318357637 · doi:10.2174/138161213804805766

Glycine Reuptake Inhibition as a New Therapeutic Approach in Schizophrenia: Focus on the Glycine Transporter 1 (GlyT1)

2012· review· en· W2318357637 on OpenAlexaff
Pierre Chue

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Pharmaceutical Design · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAmino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSarcosineNMDA receptorGlycineGlycine receptorSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)ReuptakePharmacologySynaptic cleftChemistryAmino acidGlutamate receptorBiochemistryMedicineNeuroscienceReceptorBiologyPsychiatrySerotonin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Primary negative symptoms (affective flattening or blunting, alogia, avolition) are prominent in approximately 20% of individuals suffering from schizophrenia. These symptoms are particularly associated with impaired functional outcome and poor prognosis. This is in part due to the lack of specific and effective treatments despite the development and use of the second generation antipsychotics. There is increasing evidence that suggests that combined dysfunction of the dopamine and glutamate neurotransmitter systems may underlie some of the key clinical and pathophysiological features of schizophrenia. Specifically, hypofunction of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) at critical circuits within the brain appears to be an important mechanism. Thus, it would be anticipated that modulation of NMDAR function by increasing the availability of the glutamate co-agonist, glycine, within the synaptic cleft may provide a new therapeutic strategy for the management of schizophrenia. However, the direct glycine receptor agonists such as glycine and D-cycloserine (d-4-amino-3-isoxazolidinone) have demonstrated limited efficacy in studies to date. One of the most promising approaches for enhancing NMDAR function involves modification of the activity of the high affinity glycine transporter 1 (GlyT1). Numerous compounds have been synthesized, with the early compounds being substituted glycine derivatives such as sarcosine (N-methylglycine) and Org 24598. More recent developments have focused on the non-amino acid derivatives Org 25935 (cis-N-methyl-N-(6-methoxy-1- phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalen-2-ylmethyl)amino-methylcarboxylic acid hydrochloride) and bitopertin (RG 1678). Of the molecules being investigated currently, a proof-of-concept, double-blind study of bitopertin has yielded encouraging findings, with a significant decrease in negative symptoms and no major tolerability or toxicity issues. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and to explore the potential application of these therapies in different clinical situations in order to achieve greatest effect on negative symptoms. In addition, there is still much to be learned about this class of agents in terms of other potential domains of efficacy such as positive symptoms or cognition as well as long-term safety.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.170
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Pharmaceutical DesignSame topicAmino Acid Enzymes and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207