MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2318454818 · doi:10.1021/ma501297v

Functionalization of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes via the Piers–Rubinsztajn Reaction

2014· article· en· W2318454818 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Ryan C. Chadwick, John B. Grande, Michael A. Brook, Alex Adronov

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicConducting polymers and applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCitationCarbon nanotubeSocial mediaLibrary scienceNanotechnologyComputer scienceChemistryPolymer scienceWorld Wide WebMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVNoteFunctionalization of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes via the Piers–Rubinsztajn ReactionRyan C. Chadwick, John B. Grande, Michael A. Brook, and Alex Adronov*View Author Information Department of Chemistry, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4M1, Canada*Tel (905) 525-9140 x23514; Fax (905) 521-2773; e-mail [email protected] (A.A.).Cite this: Macromolecules 2014, 47, 18, 6527–6530Publication Date (Web):September 8, 2014Publication History Received23 June 2014Revised27 August 2014Published online8 September 2014Published inissue 23 September 2014https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ma501297vhttps://doi.org/10.1021/ma501297vbrief-reportACS PublicationsCopyright © 2014 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views1192Altmetric-Citations25LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-AlertscloseSupporting Info (1)»Supporting Information Supporting Information SUBJECTS:Carbon nanotubes,Functionalization,Nucleic acid structure,Silicones,Solubility Get e-Alerts

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicConducting polymers and applicationsFrench-language works237,207