MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2318497332 · doi:10.1061/40976(316)518

Bayesian Inference of Non-Stationary Flood Frequency Models

2008· article· en· W2318497332 on OpenAlexaff
Taha B. M. J. Ouarda, Salah‐Eddine El Adlouni

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008 · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Drought Analysis
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCovariateBayesian inferenceReversible-jump Markov chain Monte CarloBayesian probabilityGeneralized extreme value distributionModel selectionGeneralized Pareto distributionPrior probabilityExtreme value theoryInferenceComputer scienceMarkov chain Monte CarloStatisticsMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the problem of fully Bayesian estimation of the extreme value model parameters is addressed. Extreme value models with covariates are an adapted tool to incorporate additional information given by dependence on the covariates or to represent trends in the time series. The Generalized Maximum Likelihood method (GML) is developed for the Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) and Generalized Pareto (GPD) models with covariates. In the GML method, the shape parameter of the GEV and GPD distributions has a Beta distribution as prior drawn for hydro-meteorological variables. This prior distribution is considered to make inference for both distributions in the case of a model with covariates in a fully Bayesian framework. The reversible jump MCMC (RJMCMC) procedure is developed in order to carry out both parameter estimation and Bayesian model selection. Real and simulated datasets are used to illustrate the proposed methodology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008Same topicHydrology and Drought AnalysisFrench-language works237,207