Argon Thermal Conductivity by Anharmonic Lattice Dynamics Calculations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lattice dynamics calculations are used to investigate thermal transport in the face-centered cubic Lennard-Jones (LJ) argon crystal between temperatures of 20 and 80 K. First, quasi-harmonic lattice dynamics calculations are used to find the frequencies and mode shapes of non-interacting phonons [1]. This information is then used as input for anharmonic lattice dynamics calculations. Anharmonic lattice dynamics is a means of computing the frequency shift and lifetime of each phonon mode due to interactions with other phonons [2]. The phonon frequencies, group velocities, and lifetimes, determined with the lattice dynamics methods, are then used to compute the thermal conductivity. The thermal conductivities predicted by the lattice dynamics methods are compared to predictions from molecular dynamics simulations. The two methods are found to agree well at low temperature but diverge at higher temperatures (i.e., near the melting point). The properties of individual phonon modes are used to identify the modes that dominate thermal transport.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".