Abstract 4729: Pathway and gene set analyses for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) genome-wide association study (GWAS)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The etiology of ovarian cancer is poorly understood but there is clearly a heritable component. Efforts to identify susceptibility alleles rarely consider interactions among alleles or their joint effects because it quickly becomes computationally intractable. In this study, we sought to identify multi-SNP effects jointly with a pathway-based analysis (GSEA-SNP) of 1,952 EOC cases and 2,042 frequency-matched controls genotyped with the Illumina 610K array. All subjects were self-reported non-Hispanic non-Jewish Caucasians, with SNP and sample call rates > 95%. Subjects with ambiguous gender, unresolved identical genotypes and < 80% European ancestry were excluded. SNPs with MAF < 1% were excluded. Missing genotypes were inferred using Mach based on the HapMap CEU population. SNPs not within introns were annotated to genes within 100 bp. We retrieved the following databases of gene sets (GSs) from a compiled database, MsigDB: human chromosome and cytogenetic band, chemical and genetic perturbations, canonical pathways, microRNA binding targets, transcription factor targets (TFT), cancer gene neighborhood (CGN), Cancer modules and Gene Ontology. The GSEA-SNP approach calculates and rank orders the trend statistic for association between each SNP and EOC risk. The Enrichment Score (ES) estimates the overrepresentation of top-ranked SNPs for each GS; the statistical significance was estimated using 10,000 permutations. The ES was normalized according to the size of GS to yield Normalized Enrichment Score (NES). The false discovery (FDR) rate was estimated using NES to adjust for multiple hypothesis testing. A total of 5181 gene-sets were included in the analysis. When controlling the FDR at 15%, 14 of the GSs were highly enriched with association signals, including two chromosomal regions, 8q13 (p = 0.0055, FDR = 0.15) and 6p24 (p = 0.0012, FDR = 0.08). BIOCARTA_LYM_PATHWAY, a pathway related to cell adhesion and diapedesis of lymphocytes, was also significant (p = 0.0002, FDR = 0.12). A TFT GS, composed of genes with promoter regions around transcription start sites containing the motif GGCNRNWCTTYS, was associated with risk (p = 0.0004, FDR = 0.08). Currently, no known transcription factors bind to this computationally predicted motif. Molecular function of double stranded RNA binding was also enriched (p = 0.005, FDR = 0.10). The remaining enriched sets were CGN sets, for which the neighborhoods around the cancer genes were originally defined using correlation of gene expression from 4 large data sets of various cancer types. The enriched CGN included: CD48 (p = 0.011), CD53 (p = 0.009), CD97 (p = 0.011), INPP5D (p = 0.010), PTPN6 (p = 0.008), VAV1 (p = 0.011), ITGAL (p = 0.012), PTPRC (p = 0.012), and STAT6 (p = 0.010). In summary, these analyses detected biologically plausible GSs related to etiology of EOC, highlighting SNPs in core enrichment groups that were not identified using individual SNP tests. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4729. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-4729
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".