MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Lesson Learned when Researching the Lived Experiences of Young Female Skiers with Knee Injuries

2011· article· en· W2318530973 on OpenAlexaff
Érin Collins, Patricia K. Doyle–Baker

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicWinter Sports Injuries and Performance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsACL injuryAnterior cruciate ligamentQualitative researchPhysical therapyPsychologyLived experienceMedicineSurgeryPsychotherapistSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injury occurs frequently in the sport of alpine ski racing and research in the mid 90's suggested that female skiers were three times more likely to have an ACL disruption than male counterparts. Interestingly career length was not reported as being reduced because of ACL injury but in fact lengthened. As an undergraduate student pursuing physical therapy and a former ski racer who had knee injuries, I undertook a summer research position that explored the lived experiences of ACL injured racers. PURPOSE: To understand how sustaining an ACL injury was meaningful to the ski racer and their return to sport. METHODS: This study used qualitative research methods; specifically hermeneutic phenomenology and potential participants were contacted through a social networking website. Three female alpine skiers between the ages of 23 and 24 who had sustained an ACL injury and had returned to skiing consented to be interviewed. Interviews were semi-structured, audio-recorded, transcribed and themes were identified using a specialized software program. RESULTS: Injury frustration was high and therefore a strong preference to see surgery as a solution was commonplace. Participants stated they were motivated to recover and described their interactions with doctors and therapists as significant components of their recovery. The most interesting aspect was the variability in injury experience despite all being female, alpine racers and injured during skiing. CONCLUSION: The in-depth qualitative interviews enabled the skiers to describe and define their own lived experiences of ACL injury, treatment, and return to sport. The female ski racers who participated in this study expressed a variety of views and beliefs about their experiences. However, saturation may not have been reached by the end of data collection and therefore it is not known if more themes would have emerged. Remaining unbiased from my own personal experiences as an injured skier proved to be the most difficult part of conducting this research. Yet learning to do this will help me be a better listener as a health care practitioner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicWinter Sports Injuries and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207