MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2318579152 · doi:10.2514/6.2005-115

The Rectangular Wall Jet - Part 1: The Effect of Varying Aspect Ratio

2005· article· en· W2318579152 on OpenAlexafffund
Joseph W. Hall, D. Ewing

Bibliographic record

Venue43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTurbulenceJet (fluid)ScalingVorticityAspect ratio (aeronautics)Reynolds numberPhysicsMechanicsFlow (mathematics)Reynolds stressGeometryVortexRoot mean squareMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of three-dimensional turbulent wall jets were formed using rectangular channels of moderate aspect ratios from Ar = 1 to 8 have been investigated using profiles and contours of the turbulent velocities in the region x/h = 3 to 60. The decay of the streamwise velocity and the lateral and vertical growth of the jet half widths could be collapsed by scaling by the square root of area and normalizing by the initial width and height of the jet. Although this scaling collapses the mean flow contours, the Reynolds stresses and the streamwise vorticity differ indicating that the physics of the flow is different.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.665

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and ExhibitSame topicAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet FlowsFrench-language works237,207