Off-pump minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting using the bilateral internal thoracic arteries and the right gastroepiproic artery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report our initial experience of an off-pump total arterial minimally invasive coronary arterial bypass grafting (MICS CABG) with the use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries (BITA) and the right gastroepiproic artery. A 47-year old male with renal dysfunction secondary to diabetes mellitus was admitted for heart failure due to severe triple-vessel disease. Off-pump MICS CABG with total arterial grafts was elected because the patient refused to undergo median sternotomy due to the strong desire to regain the baseline function promptly. Total arterial grafts were selected to maximize the potential long-term outcome. There were no postoperative complications except temporary dialysis. Postoperative coronary computed tomography revealed the patency of all grafts. Our experience suggests that BITA can be safely harvested under direct vision in MICS CABG. Total arterial graft revascularization with BITA via minimally invasive approach may offer the benefits of MICS CABG while providing the undetermined but potentially superior conduit longevity of arterial grafts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".