MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2318650340 · doi:10.1061/41031(341)279

Design Synthesis and Analysis of a Solar Chimney at KAUST

2009· article· en· W2318650340 on OpenAlexaff
Meiring J. H. Beyers, Duncan Phillips

Bibliographic record

VenueStructures Congress 2009 · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSolar Energy Systems and Technologies
Canadian institutionsRowan Williams Davies & Irwin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPedestrianArchitectural engineeringEngineeringNatural ventilationCivil engineeringThermal comfortCONTESTTransport engineeringMeteorologyVentilation (architecture)GeographyMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The new campus for the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) will be located on the Red Sea coast near the fishing village of Thuwal, approximately 50 miles North of Jeddah in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The main campus consists of two laboratory complexes, an administration building, engineering and applied mathematics building, computing and student centers, a library, Mosque, convention centre and parking garages. RWDI assisted with the design activities to integrate and optimize multiple aspects of the campus, including micro climatic evaluation, structural wind tunnel testing, acoustical design guidance and high performance ventilation studies including pedestrian thermal comfort within the laboratory buildings. One key aspect of the campus design is the inclusion of two iconic solar chimneys to assist the natural ventilation of the alleyways and courtyards surrounding the two large laboratory building clusters. The alleyways are referred to as the Spine. The laboratory buildings will house multiple levels of conditioned laboratory space connected internally and to the outside by a pedestrian Spine and courtyards. The pedestrian Spine and courtyards are unconditioned spaces connected to the outside campus areas. Maintaining the unobstructed connection between the outside and inside pedestrian area required that alternative and natural mechanisms be evaluated to moderate the internal climate where students and residents would be relatively comfortable compared to the outside. There was a strong need to avoid the perception of stagnant air and a desire to offer an outdoors-like environment with large scale shading. Achieving this relative level of thermal comfort within the pedestrian Spine and courtyards through natural ventilation and or other localized cooling strategies was the aim of the work and specifically maintaining a slight breeze within these spaces to improve the perceived thermal comfort.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.401
Threshold uncertainty score0.579

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStructures Congress 2009Same topicSolar Energy Systems and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207