MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2318673958 · doi:10.1190/1.3513576

Nonstationary predictive deconvolution based on a partition of unity

2010· article· en· W2318673958 on OpenAlexaff
Gary F. Margravé, Michael P. Lamoureux

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeconvolutionPartition (number theory)Computer scienceAlgorithmMathematicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A partition of unity (POU) is a discrete set of usually overlapping windows that sum exactly to one for a finite interval on the real line. Multiplying a signal by the POU decomposes it into a set of temporally localized signals or Gabor slices. Applying any stationary operator to these slices and allowing the operator to depend upon the slice defines a nonstationary operator. We apply a stationary prediction operator to each slice and by summing construct a time-domain nonstationary deconvolution method based on gapped prediction filtering. We call this new method slicedecon because it operates directly on the individual Gabor slices. We also prescribe the construction of nonstationary autocorrelation functions as an analysis tool. We then compare slicedecon with the more established Gabor deconvolution or gabordecon. When the prediction filtering is unit-lag, we show that slicedecon achieves results comparable to gabordecon on a nonstationary (Q attenuation) synthetic. For lags greater than unity slicedecon appears to suppress, though not eliminate, periodicities in the nonstationary autocorrelation of a signal. Testing on a synthetic with multiples has not yet indicated any dramatic elimination of the unwanted multiple reflections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207