MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mechanisms of Horseradish Peroxidase and α-Chymotrypsin

2013· article· en· W2318713952 on OpenAlexaff
H. Brian Dunford

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress in Reaction Kinetics and Mechanism · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryProton-coupled electron transferProtonPhotochemistryPorphyrinElectron transferStereochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pH range for Compound I formation of horseradish peroxidase (2.5 to 11) is the largest for any known enzyme reaction. A key part of the reaction is proton transfer from hydrogen peroxide to distal His42. This proton is retained to complete formation of a water leaving group as the ferryl porphyrin π-cation radical is formed. How can the imidazolium side chain of His42 retain a proton at very high pH? And how can it give up the proton when required at very low pH? The answer is rearrangement of electronic charge through Electron Density Circuits (EDCs) in the protein matrix. An increase of at least 9 p Ka units, which occurs on the imidazole side chain of His42 as the Compound I reactive intermediate is formed, is facilitated by an EDC. A reverse EDC facilitates proton transfer to form the water leaving group. The pathway of the EDC involves the heme, its propionate side chains, Arg41, and His42. The occurrence of EDCs in chymotrypsin reactions reinforces the nucleophilic attack, and the subsequent electron and proton transfers. They also can shift p Ka values. The catalytic triad of chymotrypsin is Ser195, His57, and Asp102. The currently accepted one-proton transfer mechanism involves Ser195 and His57, with Asp102 being regarded as too acidic to accept a proton. A comparatively small shift in the p Ka value of Asp102 is all that is required to make it a proton acceptor from His57 so a two-proton mechanism may occur.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProgress in Reaction Kinetics and MechanismSame topicPhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207