An Electrophysiologic Study of Mechanoreceptors in the Sacroiliac Joint and Adjacent Tissues
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: The somatosensory afferent units in the sacroiliac joint of an animal model were investigated using an electrophysiologic technique. OBJECTIVES: To identify the mechanosensitive receptive fields in the sacroiliac joint, and to determine their distribution and characteristics. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The sacroiliac joint is considered to be a source of lower back pain. Although there have been clinical studies on the diagnosis of sacroiliac joint pain, no satisfactory diagnostic method other than joint blocks has been reported. It still is not clear whether the sacroiliac joints actually transmit pain to the central nervous system. The sensory innervation of the sacroiliac joint has not been fully characterized neurophysiologically. METHODS: Experiments were performed on 10 adult cats weighing 2.6 to 4 kg. The animals were anesthetized with intravenous sodium pentobarbital. An L4-L7 laminectomy was performed. The L4-L6 dorsal roots were cut at their proximal ends, split, and draped over a bipolar recording electrode. Glass probes were used to search the sacroiliac joint and adjacent tissues for mechanosensitive units. When units were identified, they were stimulated electrically to obtain conduction velocities and by Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments to determine mechanical thresholds. RESULTS: In the sacroiliac joint and adjacent muscles, 29 discrete mechanosensitive units were identified. Of these 29 units, 26 were found in the posterior sacroiliac ligament and the remaining 3 in the adjacent muscles. Also, 16 units (55%) were identified in the proximal third of the sacroiliac joint. Conduction velocities of the units ranged from 3.1 to 22 m/second (average, 9.2 m/second), and 26 units were group III. Mechanical thresholds of the units ranged from 4.6 to 164.3 g (average, 69.7 g). Whereas 28 units (96.6%) had thresholds higher than 7 g, one unit (3.4%) had a threshold lower than 7 g. CONCLUSIONS: Group III units with mechanical thresholds higher than 7 g may serve as nociceptors, and units with thresholds of lower than 7 g may serve as proprioceptors. The current study showed that most of the units in the sacroiliac joint were high-threshold group III units that perhaps had a nociceptive function. This result suggests that the sacroiliac joint may be a source of lower back pain in humans. This study also showed that the sacroiliac joint has little proprioceptive function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".